
by the way your quick reply box is very very nice and i like it have a clownpiece of depression for your troubles.
>>1534
If it was only up to me I'd let people say whatever and deal with them on individual basis, but unfortunately in 2026 you have to take into account deplatforming and even legal ramifications. That's why I ask you guys to be understanding, this is just me hosting the site, I don't have the means to hire a law firm to handle these matters for me like 4chan does. I'm sorry

>>1556
You're gonna have to forgive us if we choose to build another altchan to escape the AI spam on /g/ then. Although it sounds like this is becoming harder as time goes on.
It's quite the pickle we're in. 4chan has been getting worse and in response countless altchans have been created including yours but we just can't seem to find the "Goldilocks zone" kind of altchan. It's been this constant back-and-forth tug of war. Like when the site got hacked in 2025 we mostly took refuge in the soyjak altchan that showed up but we quickly came back to 4chan.
I kinda don't mind wordfilters as even 4chan itself has them but I'm gonna be honest the UI here needs improvement. That might be one of the things pushing people away.

@ballisticromantic I just noticed you decided to make an account here. I'm assuming you you've at least considered making this place your home. Do you have any suggestions on how to get more anons to get them to come here so it won't be just me, you, and void-san? I've gotten the boot shoved up my ass for 7 days on 4chan for my bravery so I can't do much over there and maybe spamming links isn't the right way to get people to move over anyway.
No offence @void and most of the altchans that grew started and stayed like this for a while before suddenly they weren't empty places anymore. Good luck man.
>>1569
It's all good, the hardest part is getting people to join the website, if you guys already have a community, the coding part is super easy, you guys should definitely go for it
>I kinda don't mind wordfilters as even 4chan itself has them but I'm gonna be honest the UI here needs improvement.
Do you think a classic chan UI would be better?
>>1570
>stayed like this for a while before suddenly they weren't empty places anymore
Yep, thankfully the hosting is cheap lol

>>1571
Yeah but not too generic. Something that stands out but isn't as ugly as the current UI. Like make it not feel like a twitter clone.
Like idk man, the sidebar thing is compact but why not leave it at the top of the website? You could also include board shortcuts there too like /tech/ /meta/ and so on and so on.
Seconding word filters that are creative like "Melon marauders" or something savvy for the obvious ideas, and a basic bottem right theme filter like chans would be great too, it's not like people couldn't get used to filters, you'd just have to get creative with em.
or hell, figure out if offshore hosting in bumfuck nowhere where the rules are "lol blow me" is a possibility
>>1575
Most other providers don't have the same level of anti spam/ddos capability which is why 8kun or whatever they call that fizzling shithole now tends to have terrible reliability issues now.
It shouldn't have to be like this though, there's something very wrong with one company controls free speech on the web.
>>1575
>>1576
>>1577
Even if self-hosting is viable, depending on where you are you can still get into trouble with the law. Governments everywhere are working hard to censor people online
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0pky4zpxxo
>Ofcom has criticised TikTok and YouTube, saying in a new report their content feeds are "not safe enough" for children
>>1580
Yeah it honestly does seem like anywhere that's not america is doomed to fail for freedom of speech, while inside of america you're technically not going to be jailed but you sure as hell are going to be deplatformed with no funding route, ddosed by mentally ill people, spammed with illegal content, etc if you self host.
>>1582
Not much to be honest, anything on the internet is subject to being absolutely stuffed unless you have small country tier defenses or have sign on or post processes like "Take a photo of your id, now do a handstand, now do the hokey pokey, now cook some some medium rare (but not medium well) steak after getting your blood sample taken and analyzed by a lab"
>>1585
We'll see, this isn't a bad place but if your place is on the web then it's theoretically accessible unless you've somehow blocked web crawlers
>>1586
I sure have, it's nice but im just going to be a stickler and say having an option for the actual chan ui (or a close approximation) is a good idea for users.

Could the rumors that 4chan replaced jannies with AI actually be true? I made a meta thread after OP's thread got deleted except in the comment box I talked positively about AI.
Like wtf, there's no actual humans looking at what's being posted in the images? It's just AIs looking for nono words speaking bad about AI?
https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/109754057
>>1588
>I sure have, it's nice but im just going to be a stickler and say having an option for the actual chan ui (or a close approximation) is a good idea for users.
I'm gonna try that starting with a CSS overhaul
>>1590
AI for something simple like moderation is pretty cheap nowadays so I wouldn't doubt it
>>1591
But jannies work for free I hear, it boggles my mind that they would rather pay AIs rather than pay $0 lmao.
Almost 4 hours and it's still up, no ban either. For some reason this feels more insulting, I'm not good enough to get a human to inspect my thread?
>>1592
Yeah that spam too, never gets deleted...
>>1529 (OP)
related to your photo
https://umigalaxy.com/explore/general/1485

Sup peeps, always exciting to see new faces here. Nothing has been improving on 4chan and talking about it gets you punished as usual I see.
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/109748922
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/109734753
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/109748624
>>1570
I also sometimes post here. I have a couple of threads working on image compression/upscaling but lately I've just been watching 2024 Shogun tbh.
>>1626
Man, it's like watching your role model actor becoming a drug addict. I sometimes wonder if there's anything we can do to save 4chan.
But after finding out about the deletion of /qa/ which caused the 2025 hack to bring it back it makes conclude that it's better to just let it die.
>>1590
When they did a big site update about a month ago they started deleting picrel so it's plausible. It could be someone fucking with us but mods putting this up and deleting it after backlash wouldn't surprise me.
Maybe the AI janny mistook your post image for a twitter screenshot and put you on some kind of nice list.
>>1631
Holy shit, 80 fucking results from one the variants, only like 10 deleted. Not including permutations where it was cropped/resized, just a single MD5 hash.
https://desuarchive.org/g/search/image/LFQsyym9Q0XhKKeR8dLIgg%3D%3D/page/1/

>>1634
I can definitely imagine these huge AI companies making a deal with 4chan to mass purchase gorrillions of passes to let their AIs shitpost on 4chan to mould mass opinion about AI in a positive light.
Like there's some suspicious posts lately calling people who hate AI trannies. Like they couldn't get enough people to buy it by just calling them luddites so now they're appealing to something else.
Gives me the same vibes when I saw a lot of Israel influencers downplay starving Palestinians by cherry picking a few of the fat ones and ignoring hospitals full of kids that looked like skeletons.
considering the recent stats about bot traffic, it's safe to assume you are either dealing with an indian or a bot whenever you're reading or posting anywhere on the internet
of course in many cases LLMs won't even register as bot traffic since they've been able to pilot normal browsers on normal machines directly for a while

>>1640
That is the real question, how do you allow anonymous posting while on the internet without having it be abused by bots or third worlders who get paid to act like such? hell if you have sign ups we know that ai has been able to get passed capchas and other checks etc for a while (not sure about local models yet, but i'd be interested to know) so that's not exactly impossible unless their training just refuses to do so. we really do live in an online reality where slowly day day by the percentage on modern content being an actual human or made by human hands is getting lower and lower, even if only by 0.001% a day. maybe the only refuges left are niche autistic interests.
>>1640
I work for a company that proliferates mass comments on the big boy social media platforms
our customers pay us to achieve auto replying and auto liking peoples comments on ig, yt, etc.
this is a very lucrative business for x, ig, etc because they charge a ton for api access. Not everyone can afford it. And even when they can afford api access, there is a strict application process companies need to succeed with to gain access
so not all activity is bot net in nature.
of course there are ways to circumvent this with Indian mobile spammer farms, real poop eaters solving captchas and typing/liking comments
as for 4chuds, my conspiracy is they have artificial posts pre-written posts ready to push content off /g/. Most posts are a few words. Easy enough to mass produce and fire at will

>>1644
Does it have a dedicated AI slop board? That's the only reason I'm here tbh, 4chan knows there's a growing problem with it and even has like 4 fucking vidya gay boards but /g/ gets left to turn i to /ai/.
Like I don'r want to hear that "le AGI has been achieved for reals now!" thread #19483, I just want a place to discuss tech and be left alone. I don't give a fuck if that means like 1 post per hour at most, at least it won't be spam tbh.
>>1641
>That is the real question, how do you allow anonymous posting while on the internet without having it be abused by bots or third worlders who get paid to act like such?
That's the billion dollars question. I think after you reach a certain scale, there isn't much you can do about it. Even giants like tiktok and twitter have to deal with them
Maybe making the community invite only and limiting the number of invites each user can send?
By the way, I disabled captcha here and so far there hasn't been any spam, maybe it's because the website is so small that it stays under the radar

>>1645
Anyone can create a board so yes
https://8chan.moe/ais/
i dont see a general ai news thread but if you ask im sure the board owner would allow it, or if you're saying you'd like a tech board specifically
https://8chan.moe/t/ and it looks a lot more calm
>>1646
>community invite only and limited the number of invites
KF has that kind of with requiring users to send out emails for an invite (this is flawed and ai can do this trivially) but they still get hammered with CP and ddos by angry "women" because they allow talking about them freely and i do not expect that site to last sadly because of the enormous costs that puts on them which really sucks, but that's what happens in a world where speaking freely is prosecuted, hell some of the users have literally gotten their info handed over because they were idiots and used their bare ip (never ever ever ever ever browse the internet without a vpn) and even then it's not anonymous they still have user names which you could track across posts to gather info on them and pinpoint who they are with enough points to some degree of accuracy.

>>1672
It's actually way more complicated than that if you want good compression efficiency, I have a thread about it if you're interested. Otherwise exporting to %01d.png through ffmpeg and importing that to GIMP and then exporting to animated Webp seems like the easiest way to work with it albeit at low compression efficiency. Would be nice if someone made a single GUI program for doing all of this though.
>>1460 →
>>1460 →
>>1460 →
>>1460 →

>>1686
>woodpecker

>>1715
Another altchan but not as bad as the other ones IMHO.