
>
>
>
>
>
>
>...
All for a buttery smooth 2 second smooth scroll.
Not to mention the 200ms latency while typing this.

><script>...</script>
><script>...</script>
><script>...</script>
><script>...</script>
><script>...</script>
><script>...</script>
>...
And shitty filtering

>>1142 (OP)
>>1143
Void has a thread for user feedback. It got buried after a few more people joined this sekrit club.
Maybe you could suggest something. I wish I could help but I know jack shit about making websites.
>>266 →
>>1142 (OP)
>>1143
>>1144
Yeah anon please leave your suggestions to improve the website. We got tons of good ideas from anons before
Also I just created the https://umigalaxy.com/explore/meta board
>>1149
I think I'm gonna look for a more robust way to measure performance. I pretty much only use the website on my desktop with fiber connection so I need to cover my blind spots
>Scrolling in the Information -> About Us page lags as I get to the bottom of the page.
>Have you considered using the ancient practice of sending actual HTML?
This https://umigalaxy.com/about page should have been one of the fastest, maybe it's the bg-black/40 backdrop-blur-md, I'm gonna have to investigate this
>>1155
Nah, nothing. I'm on an i5-6500 desktop PC with only an intel HD 530 iGPU.
>>1156
np
>>1157
I recommend buying a used windows laptop that's around 10 years old, base model i3 CPU but no dedicated GPU. Might act as a useful optimization test device.
I know modern web browsers web browsers try to offload most rendering tasks to the GPU but on really old computers they might be forced to fallback on software rendering.

>>1157
I GOT IT: disable hardware acceleration on your web browser. I was able to replicate >>1153 that way.
Best case scenario Firefox is still a bad web browser, worst case scenario anon's CPU might be falling back to software rendering
Maybe the latter could be fixed if you auto-detect that the user doesn't have hardware acceleration? If so you could turn off smooth scrolling/animations/flares for them...
>>1159
>Firefox
I gave up on that thing years ago man, it would crash on some websites but not on Chrome, check your RAM usage you might have a memory leak because of Firefox.
So yeah it could be improper hardware acceleration support. Maybe try Chromium if you hate chrome and brave.

>>1167
Yes, thank you, it runs well now.
I didn't realize how many blurs you had going on until I hit the toggle.
>>1192
You should look into SVG and animated SVG for non-interactive parts of your website. JS/react/whatever sometimes just spends way too much CPU for some website components.
Easier said than done however since you'd have to make differrnt versions for mobile/desktop and odd screen display ratios.